## Family: cumulative
## Links: mu = probit; disc = log
## Formula: outcome ~ 1 + (1 | nuts2)
## disc ~ 1 + (1 | nuts2)
## Data: cee18 (Number of observations: 6102)
## Draws: 3 chains, each with iter = 84000; warmup = 6000; thin = 6;
## total post-warmup draws = 39000
##
## Group-Level Effects:
## ~nuts2 (Number of levels: 26)
## Estimate Est.Error l-95% CI u-95% CI Rhat Bulk_ESS Tail_ESS
## sd(Intercept) 0.96 0.31 0.49 1.68 1.00 21656 28430
## sd(disc_Intercept) 0.15 0.03 0.11 0.21 1.00 30556 34841
##
## Population-Level Effects:
## Estimate Est.Error l-95% CI u-95% CI Rhat Bulk_ESS Tail_ESS
## Intercept[1] -4.51 1.28 -7.41 -2.44 1.00 20798 28218
## Intercept[2] -3.59 1.02 -5.90 -1.93 1.00 20728 28174
## Intercept[3] -2.56 0.74 -4.25 -1.36 1.00 20596 28599
## Intercept[4] -1.64 0.50 -2.76 -0.85 1.00 20380 28598
## Intercept[5] -0.74 0.28 -1.39 -0.30 1.00 19630 28906
## Intercept[6] 0.21 0.21 -0.16 0.66 1.00 18992 28311
## Intercept[7] 1.15 0.38 0.55 2.01 1.00 20553 28616
## Intercept[8] 2.32 0.68 1.23 3.88 1.00 20860 29267
## Intercept[9] 3.65 1.05 1.96 6.02 1.00 20957 28573
## Intercept[10] 5.03 1.43 2.70 8.27 1.00 20980 29103
## disc_Intercept -0.51 0.28 -1.04 0.07 1.00 20973 28418
##
## Draws were sampled using sampling(NUTS). For each parameter, Bulk_ESS
## and Tail_ESS are effective sample size measures, and Rhat is the potential
## scale reduction factor on split chains (at convergence, Rhat = 1).
Trace-Plot
Trace-Plot
Trace-Plot
Trace-Plot
Trace-Plot
Trace-Plot
Trace-Plot
Trace-Plot
Trace-Plot
Trace-Plot
Trace-Plot
Trace-Plot
Trace-Plot
Autokorrelation-Plot
Autokorrelation-Plot
Autokorrelation-Plot
Autokorrelation-Plot
Autokorrelation-Plot
Autokorrelation-Plot
Autokorrelation-Plot
Autokorrelation-Plot
Autokorrelation-Plot
Autokorrelation-Plot
Autokorrelation-Plot
Autokorrelation-Plot
Autokorrelation-Plot
Autokorrelation-Plot
Autokorrelation-Plot
Autokorrelation-Plot
Autokorrelation-Plot
Posterior-Plot
Posterior-Plot
Posterior-Plot
Posterior-Plot
Posterior-Plot
Posterior-Plot
Posterior-Plot
Posterior-Plot
## Family: cumulative
## Links: mu = probit; disc = log
## Formula: outcome ~ 1
## disc ~ 1
## Data: cee18 (Number of observations: 6102)
## Draws: 3 chains, each with iter = 84000; warmup = 6000; thin = 6;
## total post-warmup draws = 39000
##
## Population-Level Effects:
## Estimate Est.Error l-95% CI u-95% CI Rhat Bulk_ESS Tail_ESS
## Intercept[1] -4.03 1.15 -6.66 -2.15 1.00 13374 15460
## Intercept[2] -3.32 0.95 -5.49 -1.77 1.00 13371 15690
## Intercept[3] -2.47 0.71 -4.08 -1.32 1.00 13373 15838
## Intercept[4] -1.66 0.48 -2.75 -0.89 1.00 13405 16223
## Intercept[5] -0.87 0.25 -1.43 -0.46 1.00 13489 16087
## Intercept[6] 0.01 0.03 -0.05 0.07 1.00 38009 36265
## Intercept[7] 0.90 0.26 0.48 1.49 1.00 13443 16159
## Intercept[8] 2.05 0.59 1.10 3.39 1.00 13372 15892
## Intercept[9] 3.41 0.98 1.82 5.63 1.00 13359 15944
## Intercept[10] 4.81 1.38 2.56 7.98 1.00 13385 15623
## disc_Intercept -0.56 0.29 -1.10 0.02 1.00 13346 15772
##
## Draws were sampled using sampling(NUTS). For each parameter, Bulk_ESS
## and Tail_ESS are effective sample size measures, and Rhat is the potential
## scale reduction factor on split chains (at convergence, Rhat = 1).
Trace-Plot
Trace-Plot
Trace-Plot
Autokorrelation-Plot
Autokorrelation-Plot
Autokorrelation-Plot
Posterior-Plot
Posterior-Plot
## Family: student
## Links: mu = identity; sigma = log; nu = identity
## Formula: outcome ~ 1 + (1 | nuts2)
## sigma ~ 1 + (1 | nuts2)
## Data: cee18 (Number of observations: 6102)
## Draws: 3 chains, each with iter = 66000; warmup = 6000; thin = 6;
## total post-warmup draws = 30000
##
## Group-Level Effects:
## ~nuts2 (Number of levels: 26)
## Estimate Est.Error l-95% CI u-95% CI Rhat Bulk_ESS Tail_ESS
## sd(Intercept) 0.97 0.15 0.73 1.31 1.00 19414 24765
## sd(sigma_Intercept) 0.15 0.03 0.11 0.21 1.00 23862 26460
##
## Population-Level Effects:
## Estimate Est.Error l-95% CI u-95% CI Rhat Bulk_ESS Tail_ESS
## Intercept 5.22 0.19 4.84 5.60 1.00 13332 21070
## sigma_Intercept 0.53 0.03 0.47 0.60 1.00 20680 25839
##
## Family Specific Parameters:
## Estimate Est.Error l-95% CI u-95% CI Rhat Bulk_ESS Tail_ESS
## nu 84.39 36.44 36.45 175.38 1.00 30316 29633
##
## Draws were sampled using sampling(NUTS). For each parameter, Bulk_ESS
## and Tail_ESS are effective sample size measures, and Rhat is the potential
## scale reduction factor on split chains (at convergence, Rhat = 1).
Trace-Plot
Trace-Plot
Trace-Plot
Trace-Plot
Trace-Plot
Trace-Plot
Trace-Plot
Trace-Plot
Trace-Plot
Trace-Plot
Trace-Plot
Trace-Plot
Trace-Plot
Trace-Plot
Trace-Plot
Autokorrelation-Plot
Autokorrelation-Plot
Autokorrelation-Plot
Autokorrelation-Plot
Autokorrelation-Plot
Autokorrelation-Plot
Autokorrelation-Plot
Autokorrelation-Plot
Autokorrelation-Plot
Autokorrelation-Plot
Autokorrelation-Plot
Autokorrelation-Plot
Autokorrelation-Plot
Autokorrelation-Plot
Autokorrelation-Plot
Posterior-Plot
Posterior-Plot
Posterior-Plot
Posterior-Plot
Posterior-Plot
Posterior-Plot
Posterior-Plot
Posterior-Plot
Posterior-Plot
Posterior-Plot
Posterior-Plot
Posterior-Plot
Posterior-Plot
Posterior-Plot
Posterior-Plot
## Family: student
## Links: mu = identity; sigma = log; nu = identity
## Formula: outcome ~ 1
## sigma ~ 1
## Data: cee18 (Number of observations: 6102)
## Draws: 3 chains, each with iter = 11500; warmup = 1500; thin = 1;
## total post-warmup draws = 30000
##
## Population-Level Effects:
## Estimate Est.Error l-95% CI u-95% CI Rhat Bulk_ESS Tail_ESS
## Intercept 5.35 0.03 5.30 5.40 1.00 19278 17569
## sigma_Intercept 0.67 0.01 0.65 0.69 1.00 20513 18800
##
## Family Specific Parameters:
## Estimate Est.Error l-95% CI u-95% CI Rhat Bulk_ESS Tail_ESS
## nu 133.80 46.53 64.95 244.03 1.00 18893 18156
##
## Draws were sampled using sampling(NUTS). For each parameter, Bulk_ESS
## and Tail_ESS are effective sample size measures, and Rhat is the potential
## scale reduction factor on split chains (at convergence, Rhat = 1).
Trace-Plot
Autokorrelation-Plot
Posterior-Plot
Copyright:
Benedikt Philipp Kleer, 2022 (Online-Appendix zur Promotion, eingereicht am 14. September 2022, Fachbereich 03, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen).